It’s creepy enough to see a long list of mystery ingredients listed on the back of a fave shampoo bottle, but what about how those chemicals interact?
Dioxane is a common toxin found in cleansing personal care products that’s linked to cringe-worthy health and environmental concerns. What’s worse is that we probably won’t be able to pick it out of a label because it’s not an ingredient; it’s the byproduct of chemicals reacting to one another. Amy Ziff, founder of MADE SAFE and leading lady of our series on toxic personal care ingredients, is teaching us all about eerily ubiquitous dioxane and how to steer clear…
What is It? 1,4-dioxane (sometimes just called dioxane) is found in products from personal care products to laundry detergent, but it’s not an intentionally added ingredient. It’s a contaminant that’s created when certain common ingredients are mixed together.
1,4-dioxane is an expected contaminant from a process called ethoxylation, when ethylene oxide is added to other ingredients to make them less harsh. A good example of this is sodium lauryl sulfate, which is harsh on skin. It’s often ethoxylated to convert it to sodium laureth sulfate; 1,4-dioxane is created in the process and contaminates the sodium laureth sulfate.
1,4-dioxane is most often found in products that suds, like shampoos, shower gels, dish soaps and laundry detergents. It’s also been found in toothpastes, mouthwashes, deodorant and hair dyes.
What’s the Concern? 1,4-dioxane is listed as a known or probable carcinogen by several scientific agencies, including appearing on California’s Proposition 65 list as linked to cancer, as a known animal carcinogen by the National Toxicology Program, and as a likely human carcinogen by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). According to EPA, it’s also present groundwater, ambient air and indoor environments, in addition to showing up in products we use on a daily basis.
In fact, 1,4-dioxane’s toxicity is concerning enough it landed on the EPA’s list of top ten chemicals for evaluation under the updated Toxic Substances Control Act. Under this updated law, the EPA is required to review existing chemicals to determine, “whether they present an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment.” If the answer is yes, EPA has to place restrictions on or ban that chemical.
It’s estimated that the EPA may take up to five years to evaluate and regulate these first ten chemicals. Want a faster solution to reduce your contact with this toxic chemical? Read on.
How to Avoid It: Read labels on products like shampoo, bubble bath, liquid soaps and laundry detergents to avoid it. 1,4-dioxane won’t appear on ingredient lists because it’s not intentionally-added, however you can avoid these chemicals that are commonly contaminated with it:
– Sodium laureth sulfate
– PEG compounds (usually listed as “PEG” followed by a number)
– Chemicals that end in “eth” (denotes ethoxylation), like ceteareth and oleth
You can lather and wash without any worry by simply using castile soap without any fragrance. Also look for USDA Organic certified, which doesn’t allow ethoxylation processes, and the MADE SAFE seal, which screens for toxic contaminants like 1,4-dioxane. MADE SAFE certified options for sudsing/lather products include: shampoos from Hairprint and True Botanicals, body wash from Pleni Naturals and Annmarie Gianni Skin Care, and liquid soap from Kosmatology.
The Chalkboard Mag and its materials are not intended to treat, diagnose, cure or prevent any disease. All material on The Chalkboard Mag is provided for educational purposes only. Always seek the advice of your physician or another qualified healthcare provider for any questions you have regarding a medical condition, and before undertaking any diet, exercise or other health related program.
True Botanicals and Annmarie Gianni Skin Care are VERY expensive. Can you suggest more labels to choose from that are more affordable?
Try SW Basics, Everyday Shea, Black African Soap, Kosmatology, Pleni Naturals and others. As with food, higher quality products often come with a higher price-tag but we recommend using fewer products and making higher quality choices which can help when you are on a budget.
What an excellent article! Thank you for bringing this to our attention! It makes total sense a friend of mine became seriously ill until they found that amongst other substances he had highly toxic levels of formaldehyde in his system – he did not know where it should have come from and I wonder now if it was because of interactive toxins. This is an extremely important part of health research to review not just the substance but bioaccumulation etc.
The FDA have monitored 1,4 dioxane levels in cosmetics and the like since the 1970s. They have not found the levels in these products to be harmful, and have in fact been steadily reducing since the 90s due to industry guidance. Furthermore the compound is in contact with the skin very briefly in soap/ shampoo preparations, reducing the degree of dermal absorption. In addition the compound evaporates rapidly when applied to skin, reducing exposure even further, especially for longer applied lotions. Dose is everything. Paracelsus understood this and he lived 500 years ago. Finally, dioxane is broken down and leaves the body very rapidly, so bioaccumulation from repeated low level exposure is unlikely. Don’t buy in to constant “chemicals!” scare stories just because the science sounds scary when you don’t understand it.
What is happening(or threatening to happen) to the EPA under this new presidential administration is worrying for the future of informing and updating the public on potential health hazards like 1,4 Dioxane.
I am truly concerned about the apparent contempt for science that seems to be unveiling itself this past week and what’s to come.